• panicnow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    21 days ago

    TIL about another way of voting—does it have an official name. My gut reaction is that while multiple votes would usually result in the same thing as rank choice votes, there is less preference information in your method. I suspect that it might end up electing less politically extreme candidates than ranked choice voting, but I feel like I could be wrong about that.

    I do like the simplicity of your multiple votes method. I think it is easy to explain to people who maybe are off-put by ranked voting or other slightly more complex ways.

    I think I would prefer ranked, but I would take pretty much anything to improve our system.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      It doesn’t sound like an awful idea, but what if I don’t want my vote going to a candidate unless my first choice(s) don’t have a chance of being elected?

      Like I always vote for eco or worker party here, but would absolutely put liberals as my third choice if only because I’d rather them over the conservatives.

      But I really really don’t want liberals getting my vote unless I’m out of better options.

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 days ago

        As a one-off election, you wouldn’t be able to. But in the real world, we get elections every few years, so you can see how many people approve of the eco or worker party. If it’s high enough that they can potentially take over the liberals, then you can safely drop your approval for them in the next election.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      I agree.

      The system relies on voters having unique opinions. There’s a lot that could go wring, but its still way better than winner takes all.